Introduction
Despite the discrepancies in understanding Artificial Intelligence (AI), there are certain universal characteristics that these tools and technologies have which makes them useful in almost every field. Considering that humans possess the ability to think, judge, and form intentions, AI fundamentally tries to incorporate this by reacting to stimulus in a way that is comparable to conventional human responses. While following and executing the pre-planned and pre-configured protocols, technology has advanced to become a more complex final product with intelligence like that of humans. This is what gives it real potential to transform justice systems worldwide.
The use of AI in the Indian Judicial System
The Indian judiciary is incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) to tackle persistent issues including backlogs in cases and facilitating access to justice. The legal landscape is changing as a result of the recognition of AI’s transformational potential. The Indian judiciary is utilizing AI in a number of ways and is considered an early adopter of AI. The AI tool SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court Efficiency) reads case files, gathers facts, provides pertinent information, and provides precedents to help Supreme Court judges make decisions. It also aids in court administration by allocating tasks and organizing big caseloads. For the assistance of the Courts, documents are translated from the local languages using SUVAS (Supreme Court Vidhi Anuvaad Software). AI transcription has also been implemented which provides the live transcription of the proceedings of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court. In addition to this the Punjab & Haryana High Court also placed a question to Chat GPT in order to get a broader view of bail jurisprudence.
The use of AI in the Indian Judicial System is available in detail at : Artificial Intelligence in the Indian Judicial system
The use of AI in the Judicial System around the Globe
The use of AI in the Indian Judicial System is still in an embryonic stage with some developments as has been noted above however there has been a rapid incorporation of AI around the world. The AI interventions in the foreign jurisdictions are the following:
Earlier the practice of the Brazilian Supreme Court included the above said exercise being taken up by the civil servants which consumed a lot of man power and time which is now eliminated by the use of VICTOR.
Although these use examples demonstrate the variety of ways AI is being applied in justice systems, there are worries about its unrestricted inclusion. This is the reason why the application of AI needs to be carefully planned out with enough safeguards and control systems. A few issues that must be resolved before AI is included into legal systems such as the violation of IPR’s, concerns over accuracy and more.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/01/us/politics/
[2] https://data.cityofchicago.org/Public-Safety/Strategic-Subject-List-Historical/4aki-r3np/about_data
[3] www.mondaq.com/brazil/constitutional-administrative-law/57864/the-supreme-federal-tribunal-and-the-general-repercussion-requirement#:~:text=The%20concept%20of%20general%20repercussion,party’s%20unwillingness%20to%20accept%20defeat
[4] https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Responsible-AI-in-the-Indian-Justice-System-A-Strategy-Paper.pdf
[5] https://adric.ca/robot-mediator-settles-first-ever-court-case/
[6] https://www.building.co.uk/building-the-future-commission/how-robot-mediators-and-ai-can-help-resolve-construction-disputes/5122026.article
[7] https://www.rbth.com/science-and-tech/327585-free-legal-advice-robolawyer